Senate committee eyes vote to shield natural gas from cities’ bans

By: - June 15, 2021 12:55 am

Gas pipeline construction building excavation. Getty Images.

Update: The Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee passed House Bill 201 at 10 a.m. Tuesday.

An Ohio Senate committee could vote out legislation Tuesday that would shield the natural gas industry from the potential of cities seeking to crack down on fossil fuel emissions. 

If passed, House Bill 201 would block any city or county from issuing any law or zoning code that “limits, prohibits, or prevents” people and businesses from obtaining natural gas or propane service. 

At least 14 states have passed similar preemption bills this year, according to a running count from the National Resources Defense Council, with similar efforts underway in another five.

A small but growing list of progressive cities around the U.S. have passed legislation banning new buildings from obtaining natural gas hookups, an effort to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.

No Ohio cities have joined in, although some (including Cincinnati, Lakewood, and Cleveland) have passed resolutions establishing goals of becoming carbon neutral in the coming years.

About two in three Ohio households use natural gas for heat, far more than electricity (25%), propane (5%), or other sources, according to U.S. Census data compiled by the Legislative Service Commission, which conducts policy analysis for lawmakers. 

The House passed the bill in mid-May on a 65-32 vote, with all Republicans and two Democrats in support.

Supporters say the legislation preserves consumers’ rights of choice as to the energy they purchase. Also, they say allowing cities or counties to restrict natural gas development would create a labyrinth of local regulations for the industry to work around. 

“Limiting energy choice would effectively be forcing businesses and homeowners to replace the appliances they want to use — for example, grills, hot water heaters, fireplaces, friers and furnaces — with less efficient and more costly ones,” said Stephanie Kromer, an energy lobbyist with the Chamber of Commerce, to lawmakers last month. 

The bulk of the political opposition stems from cities and environmental advocates. 

The Ohio Municipal League, which represents local governments around the state, said the bill raises issues of local control. In written testimony, it argued the “Home Rule” provision of the state Constitution allows cities to restrict natural gas development as they see fit. 

Dan Sawmiller, Ohio energy policy director for the NRDC, said the legislation is part of a national, industry-backed effort to protect consumer demand for natural gas at the environment’s expense.

“It’s clearly not a piece of legislation about what’s best for Ohio,” he said in an interview. “It’s about what’s best for the fossil fuel industry.”

Most critics took aim at HB 201 in the big picture context of Ohio energy policy than the bill by itself. 

Several pointed to House Bill 6 from 2019 (now at the center of a public corruption prosecution), which passed massive bailouts to coal and nuclear plants while gutting Ohio’s energy efficiency and renewable energy portfolio standards for utilities.

Others pointed to the Senate’s 20-13 vote June 3 to pass legislation that gives local governments new, unique abilities to nix wind and solar projects

Sen. Matt Dolan, R-Chagrin Falls, commented on the apparent discord at a hearing on HB 201 last month. 

“This is a bill that’s telling local governments they can’t ban a particular energy source [gas], and we just had discussions on a bill that expressly tells governments you can ban an energy source [wind and solar],” he said. 

Senate Energy Chairman Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, who sponsored the wind and solar bill, said Dolan was “comparing apples and oranges.” He made similar comments in an interview earlier this month.

“I think when you’re looking at, for example, a natural gas plant: a natural gas plant is going to be confined within one area, a natural gas plant is not going to affect nearly as many acres in most places as these solar and wind projects are. They’re not as transformative, and they’re not being put primarily in residential areas in rural parts of the state,” he said.

Senate President Matt Huffman, R-Lima, said to reporters earlier this month that wind and solar play such a small role in Ohio’s energy mix that they’re not “deserving” of the legal treatment coal or gas receive. Local officials currently have no ability to kill wind or solar developments. 

HB 201 is scheduled for a possible committee vote Tuesday and could make it to the floor for a full vote this week, pending the whims of Senate leadership, according to a Senate spokesman. 

If passed, the legislation would go to Gov. Mike DeWine for approval or veto. A DeWine spokesman did not respond to an inquiry. 



Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Jake Zuckerman
Jake Zuckerman

Jake Zuckerman is a statehouse reporter. He spent three years chronicling the West Virginia Legislature for The Charleston Gazette-Mail after covering cops and courts for The Northern Virginia Daily.